excuse me. how exactly do we know exactly how vampires’ bodies work? It is called FICTION for a reason. So what if Stephanie Meyer decided to challenge what “vampires” typically are considered to be like? J.K. Rowling challenged the typical definition of “wizard” so why is it so damn wrong for Stephanie Meyer to do the same thing? I like how this person is talking as if vampires and werewolves exist and have cold hard facts backing them up. It doesn’t make sense.

These two stories should never be compared; they were never SUPPOSED to be compared. They are separate and I don’t understand why it is necessary for both to be picked apart and analyzed piece by piece. I am a fan of both, personally. So all of you die-hard Harry Potter fans/Twihaters and all of you Twilight fans/HPhaters, just suck it up; they are both great stories.